Updated February 2026

Fabricate vs Framer

Full-Stack Apps vs Visual Design

Fabricate: 6 wins
Framer: 2 wins
Ties: 2

Key Takeaways

  • Fabricate generates full-stack applications with databases and business logic; Framer creates visually stunning marketing websites and landing pages.
  • Framer offers industry-leading animation and interaction design tools that Fabricate cannot match.
  • Fabricate includes built-in authentication (Clerk), database (D1), and payment processing (Stripe) -- none of which Framer provides.
  • For SaaS products, MVPs, and business applications, Fabricate is the only viable choice between the two.
  • Framer is the superior tool for portfolio sites, agency websites, and creative showcases where visual impact is paramount.
  • Fabricate generates exportable code you own; Framer sites are tied to Framer's hosting and CMS infrastructure.
  • Many teams use both: Framer for the marketing site and Fabricate for the actual product application.

TL;DR - Quick Verdict

Choose Fabricate if:

  • You need full-stack applications with databases and logic
  • You want user authentication and payment processing
  • You're building SaaS, MVPs, or business applications
  • You want AI to build from descriptions, not visual design

Choose Framer if:

  • You're focused on marketing sites and landing pages
  • You prefer visual design tools over descriptions
  • You need advanced animations and interactions
  • You want portfolio sites or creative showcases

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureFabricateFramerWinner
Full-Stack Applications
Fabricate builds complete apps with backend
Fabricate
Visual Design Tools
Framer has powerful visual design
Framer
Database Included
Fabricate includes database setup
Fabricate
User Authentication
Built-in auth with Fabricate
Fabricate
Payment Processing
Stripe integration in Fabricate
Fabricate
Animations
Framer excels at animations
BasicAdvancedFramer
AI Generation
Fabricate AI is more comprehensive
BasicFabricate
CMS
Both have content management
Tie
Code Export
Fabricate exports full code
LimitedFabricate
Custom Domains
Both support custom domains
Tie
In-Depth Guide

Fabricate vs Framer: Application Logic vs Visual Storytelling

Framer has redefined what it means to build a website without code. Its canvas-based editor gives designers pixel-perfect control over every element, with animation capabilities that rival custom JavaScript implementations. Scroll-triggered animations, page transitions, hover effects, and complex interaction sequences can all be built visually without writing a single line of code. For brands where the website itself is the product experience, Framer is genuinely exceptional.

Fabricate operates in a completely different space. While Framer asks "how should this look and move?" Fabricate asks "what should this software do?" Describing a SaaS product to Fabricate produces a working application with user accounts, data persistence, API endpoints, payment processing, and deployment -- none of which are even conceptually possible in Framer. The visual design of a Fabricate app is AI-generated and clean, but it prioritizes function over motion design.

The distinction becomes clearest when considering what each tool cannot do. Framer cannot create a user login system, store customer data in a database, process payments, or run server-side logic. These are fundamental requirements for any application beyond a static website. Fabricate cannot match Framer's animation timeline editor, its precise layout control, or its ability to create the kind of immersive visual experiences that agencies and brands demand.

Pricing reflects these different value propositions. Framer's plans center around CMS items, site traffic, and collaboration seats -- metrics that matter for content-driven websites. Fabricate's pricing is project-based with all infrastructure included, which makes sense for applications that need databases and authentication rather than CMS collections and page views.

The most pragmatic approach for many businesses is using both tools for their respective strengths. Build the marketing website and landing pages in Framer where visual polish drives conversion rates. Build the actual product -- the dashboard, the admin panel, the customer portal -- in Fabricate where functionality and reliability matter more than scroll-triggered animations.

Real-World Scenarios

Which tool is best for your specific use case?

Building a SaaS Product with User Dashboard and Billing

Fabricate

Fabricate is the only option here. A SaaS product requires user authentication, subscription management, data storage, API endpoints, and deployment -- none of which Framer can provide. Fabricate generates the complete application including Stripe billing integration, Clerk authentication, and a D1 database for all user data.

Creating a Portfolio Website with Immersive Animations

Competitor

Framer is the clear winner for portfolio and creative showcase sites. Its animation tools allow designers to create scroll-triggered reveals, parallax effects, and micro-interactions that make portfolios feel premium. Fabricate can generate a functional portfolio, but it cannot match Framer's visual sophistication for this use case.

Launching a Startup with Marketing Site and Product App

Tie

Use both tools together. Framer for the marketing site where first impressions drive signups, and Fabricate for the actual product application where users log in, manage their data, and interact with your service. This is a common and effective pattern for startups that want both visual polish on the marketing side and robust functionality on the product side.

Building a Customer Portal with Data Management

Fabricate

Fabricate is the right choice for any project that involves user data, authentication, or server-side logic. A customer portal needs login flows, role-based access control, data tables, and CRUD operations -- all of which Fabricate generates automatically. Framer cannot create any of these features.

Agency Website with Case Studies and Contact Form

Competitor

Framer excels for agency websites where the site itself demonstrates the agency's design capabilities. Its CMS handles case studies elegantly, and its visual tools create the kind of memorable experiences that attract clients. A simple contact form can be handled through Framer's built-in form elements or third-party integrations.

Performance Benchmarks

MetricFabricateFramer
Time to Marketing SiteUnder 10 minutes2-8 hours (with animations)
Full-Stack App ReadyUnder 10 minutesNot possible
Animation ComplexityBasic CSS transitionsAdvanced scroll/interaction animations
Database IntegrationBuilt-in (D1)Not available
Auth SystemBuilt-in (Clerk)Not available
Payment ProcessingBuilt-in (Stripe)Not available

Pricing Comparison

Fabricate

  • Free:Build and deploy apps
  • Pro:Custom domains, more projects
  • Team:Collaboration features

Framer

  • Free:Limited free plan
  • Pro:$15/month
  • Team:Custom pricing

Framer is ideal for marketing sites with advanced design. Fabricate is better value for applications that need databases, auth, and business logic.

Marketing Site vs Product Application

Fabricate generates the complete course platform: React frontend with course catalog, video player, progress tracking dashboard, and admin analytics, plus a D1 database for courses, enrollments, and progress data, Clerk authentication for students and instructors, Stripe integration for course purchases, and deployment to Cloudflare. Framer could create a beautiful marketing page for the course platform with animated course previews and testimonials, but the actual platform with user accounts, video hosting, progress tracking, and payments is beyond its capabilities.

Fabricate Prompt

Build an online course platform where instructors can create courses with video lessons, students can enroll and track progress, and admins can manage users and view analytics. Include payment processing for course purchases.

Framer: Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Industry-leading visual design and animation tools with scroll-triggered interactions
  • Beautiful CMS for content-driven websites with visual editing
  • Excellent for marketing sites, portfolios, and brand experiences

Cons

  • Cannot build applications with databases, authentication, or server-side logic
  • Sites are tied to Framer's hosting and CMS infrastructure
  • No code export for full application logic -- limited to static site output
Our marketing team uses Framer for our gorgeous landing page, but when we needed the actual product -- user accounts, dashboards, payments -- Fabricate built it all in a single afternoon.

Priya K.

Co-Founder at a Design-Led Startup

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Fabricate or Framer better?

Depends on your needs. Fabricate builds full-stack applications. Framer is a visual design tool for marketing sites. Choose based on what you're building.

Can Framer build web applications?

Framer is focused on websites and landing pages. It lacks the database, authentication, and backend features needed for true applications.

Which has better design capabilities?

Framer has more advanced visual design and animation tools. Fabricate generates designs from descriptions using AI.

Can I build a SaaS with Framer?

Not easily. Framer lacks database and auth features. Fabricate includes everything needed for SaaS products.

Which is easier for beginners?

Fabricate is easier if you know what you want to build - just describe it. Framer requires learning its visual design interface.

Can I use both together?

You could design marketing pages in Framer and build your actual app in Fabricate. They serve different purposes.

Ready to Build with Fabricate?

Full-stack applications with AI. Database, authentication, and deployment included. Start free today.