ComparisonUpdated
OpenAI's and Anthropic's coding agents now do much the same work: they read a codebase, change files, run commands and open pull requests, from a terminal, an editor, a desktop app or the browser. What separates them is the plans they come with, how their limits work, and the models they run.
The short answer: if you already pay for ChatGPT, or want to start free, pick Codex. It comes with ChatGPT's plans, and its CLI, editor extension and cloud tasks are listed from Plus, at $20 a month. If you want Claude's models, or already pay for Claude, pick Claude Code, from Claude Pro at $20. Both read AGENTS.md, and Codex can import a Claude Code setup.
Best for: a free start, cloud tasks and GPT models
Codex is OpenAI's coding agent.
Best for: Claude's models, on the Claude plan you have
Claude Code is Anthropic's coding agent.
Best for: an app built for you, with no code to write
Codex and Claude Code make people who write code faster.
Feature by feature, with the tool that does each one better.
Codex is OpenAI's coding agent. It reads a repository, edits files, runs commands and tests, and reviews code, in the ChatGPT desktop app, a terminal (the Codex CLI), an extension for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf, on the web and on iOS, and in Xcode and JetBrains through their own integrations. Cloud tasks run from your GitHub repositories, each in its own workspace, and keep going while your computer sleeps, then hand back changes to commit or a pull request. It reads AGENTS.md, connects to other tools through MCP, runs subagents and scheduled tasks, and comes with ChatGPT's plans, on OpenAI's GPT models. The CLI and its SDK are open source.
Choose it if
Claude Code is Anthropic's coding agent. It reads your codebase, edits files, runs commands and works with your other tools, and it runs in the terminal, in VS Code and JetBrains, in a desktop app and in the browser, including on a phone. It works with git itself: it stages changes, writes commit messages, creates branches and opens pull requests. It reads a CLAUDE.md file (or an AGENTS.md) at the start of every session, connects to other tools through MCP, and can split a job across several agents. It comes with Claude's paid plans and runs Claude's models.
Choose it if
The two now overlap almost entirely. Both are agents you hand a task to: they read the project, plan, change files, run commands and tests, and hand back changes to review or a pull request. Both run in a terminal, in VS Code, in a desktop app, in the browser and on a phone, both keep working in the cloud while your computer is off, and both read AGENTS.md, connect other tools over MCP and split work across subagents.
The differences start with the plans. Codex comes with ChatGPT's, so it reaches further down: Free and Go, at $8, include it in the desktop app on GPT-6 Luna as it rolls out, while the CLI, the editor extension and cloud tasks are listed from Plus at $20. Claude Code starts at Claude Pro, also $20, or $17 billed yearly. At the top, ChatGPT Pro costs $100, $200 or $500 a month with no five-hour limit for now, and Claude Max $100 or $200, with 5x or 20x Pro's usage and monthly API credits for your own apps.
Then each has its own edges. Codex's CLI and SDK are open source, Sites can host what you build with it on eligible plans, and its CLI imports a Claude Code setup in one command. Claude Code comes with every paid Claude plan, every Team seat included, has its own JetBrains plugin and runs Claude's models. If you can, try both on the same task: one AGENTS.md file guides both.
You already pay for one of them
Start with the agent your plan includes: Codex with ChatGPT Plus, Pro or Business, Claude Code with Claude Pro, Max or Team. Each costs nothing more until you reach its limits.
Either works
Trying a coding agent without paying
ChatGPT's Free plan includes Codex in the desktop app on GPT-6 Luna, as it rolls out. Claude's free plan has no Claude Code.
Pick Codex
A review on every pull request
Both review pull requests on GitHub: Codex on Plus and up, and Claude Code through its GitHub Code Review and GitHub Actions, which it also runs in GitLab CI/CD. Codex runs in other pipelines through codex exec.
Either works
Long coding days, every day
Codex's Pro currently has no five-hour limit, from $100 a month. Claude Code's Max gives 5x or 20x Pro's usage for $100 or $200, within weekly limits.
Pick Codex
Trying both on the same project
Both read AGENTS.md, so one file of project instructions guides both. The Codex CLI's /import brings a Claude Code setup across, with its skills, MCP servers, hooks, subagents and up to 50 recent chats, and leaves the original as it was.
Either works
At $20 a month they cost the same: ChatGPT Plus brings Codex's CLI, editor extension and cloud tasks, and Claude Pro brings Claude Code, or costs $17 a month billed yearly. Below that, only Codex has a way in, in ChatGPT's desktop app on Free and on Go at $8, as it rolls out. Above it, Claude's Max costs $100 or $200 a month and ChatGPT's Pro $100, $200 or $500, with no five-hour limit for now. Neither prices by the request: both count use against five-hour and weekly limits, and both let you keep going past them, Codex with ChatGPT credits and Claude Code with usage credits at API rates. Through the API, GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Sonnet 5.5 both cost $2 per million tokens in and $10 out.
We make Fabricate
Codex and Claude Code make people who write code faster. If you would rather not write any, Fabricate builds a web app from a sentence: the screens, a database, sign-in and the server code, in one project you change by asking. Building and previewing are free; publishing is on Pro and Max.
Build free, go live on Pro.
The pages this guide quotes, each with the day it was read.
About this guide
Written by the Fabricate team. Fabricate is our product; Codex and Claude Code are not, and the page marks ours where it mentions it.
The pages we read about each tool are listed here, each with the day we read it. We compared the tools from their own pricing pages and documentation, not by signing up for them. Spotted something out of date? Write to info@fabricate.build.
Looking for Webflow alternatives? Compare the top website builders and app builders, including Fabricate, on features an...
Read moreLooking for Bubble alternatives? Compare the top no-code platforms and AI app builders, including Fabricate, on features...
Read moreFabricate vs Softr, compared from Softr's own pricing page on October 21, 2026: portals and internal tools, app user lim...
Read moreSee how Fabricate stacks up against every major tool.
Read moreDescribe your app and get a frontend, database, logins and a live URL in minutes.
Read more